Date: 2006-05-09 07:01 am (UTC)
Seems like there's a lot of potential debate over what "recognizable" is, and this hinges around what will stand up in a court. Unfortunately, in our current court system that means potentially "anything at all". Even foot pictures if you can put the right story around them, truth notwithstanding. Even pictures of shadows, or images that do not contain the individual at all if the argument can be made that they were there ("This body painting is clearly the work of the defendant, your honor."). Put the case in front of the right judge with an inadequate defense and anything goes.

It's truly a messy little world, and would be better if you could *truly* get outside of it. Better still, with a lever and a fulcrum.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

errantember: (Default)
errantember

December 2015

S M T W T F S
  12 345
6 789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 13th, 2025 12:05 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios